1) Fundamentally, we all go by our System 1 thinking - with 'perception bias"," recency bias" and what not. All of us including the so-called Economists are basically Irrationalists.

Blogging about Society, individual and collective behaviour/herd mentality, nudges,economics,business,politics,sports and spirituality and on all the other subjects about which I know very little !!
1) Fundamentally, we all go by our System 1 thinking - with 'perception bias"," recency bias" and what not. All of us including the so-called Economists are basically Irrationalists.
Maybe in the long run India would have to enter this trade pact but certainly not at this time when China's hegemony is strangling many of the Asian and African countries.
With many of the other Asian countries India already has a free trade pact except China.
China is a net exporting country to India and therefore any free trade pact removing the tariff barriers would only directly and indirectly benefit China.
Let us look at the specific pros and cons to RCEP:
Pros
1)The purpose of RCEP was to make it easier for products and services,investments, intellectual property rights of each of these countries to be available across the region. Differential rights have been granted to economically less developed countries
2)this pact covers the economic powerhouses of Asia including Japan, China and South Korea covering roughly 30% of Global GDP and 30% of World's population.
3)the pact is intended to reduce redtape and also tariffs.
4)it will bring about uniform customs procedures and rules of origin which will facilitate global supply chains and trade within the region.With less regulatory framework trade will become seamless.
Cons:
1)this does not cover labour unions, environmental concerns and sustainability,human rights and government subsidies.
2)it does not commit countries to open services and other vulnerable areas of their economies.
3)Some countries may become dumping grounds for other manufacturing countries.The pact consists of countries that are the largest exporters of the world.
4)India's trade deficit with 11 RCEP member countries has worsened post 14 RTAs(Regional Trade Agreement) already signed with them. There have not been any significant export gains for India out of the already existing 14 RTAs.
5)Tariff reduction in a calibrated manner suggested by India has not been accepted by other RCEP countries. India suggested that with ASEAN countries it will reduce tariffs by 80%,for other countries like Japan, South Korea by 65% and for other countries like China, Australia,New Zealand by 42.5%.The countries disagreed and demanded uniform relief of 90% on tariffs.
6) In order to protect domestic manufacturing, India suggested auto-triggering and snapback measures which will kick in immediately if certain agreed thresholds get breached in imports from certain countries esp. China for manufacturing imports and Australia and New Zealand for dairy products and other ASEAN countries for plantation products like Rubber .
7)India is already suffering from half of its trade deficit coming from China, and post the pact its trade deficit may worsen as with other RTA countries since India is a big consumption destination with vast population.Moreover the vagueness in addressing the concerns on trade in Services sector in which india has a comparative advantage. also left India with no option but to keep out of it for some more time.
8) Since India has launched its "Atmanirbhar Bharat", PLI schemes for giving a huge push for Make in India , India will be benefited from RCEP after its manufacturing sector makes some significant gains in the domestic market.
9)Some countries do not see political alignments with few other countries like India and China due to the ongoing geopolitical tensions.(link)
RCEP member countries have kept the door open for India and india may well take a decision to join this after a year or two lag when its domestic economy starts growing at 8-10%. India can bring strong institutional policy framework to RCEP and many countries want India to be in RCEP as a counterbalance to China's growing clout and influence.
Let us dwell into the concepts and significance of these two dieties.
Ganesha, the son of Parvati and Shiv, is worshipped first before starting any new job or work. Even if you want to start writing or reading , you invoke the blessings of Lord Ganesha who goes under various names- Ganapathi, Vigneshwar, Vinayak, and Pillayar in Tamilnadu. Ganesha Gayathri, Pancharatnam are some of the important Ganesha mantras and hymns.
Adi Ganesha idol is in a Temple near Tiruvarur in Tamilnadu with a human face.The mythological story says that Shiv slew His head and then fixed the head of the animal that He saw first after this beheading of His son. Ganesha after that with the elephant head is worshipped as the wisdom god by Hindus.
Why only Hindus. He is worshipped in Indonesia where He finds Himself in their currency notes. He is considered the destroyer of evil in Japan. In Mexico, Ganesha idols were said to have been found in archaeological excavations.
Now let us move to Hanuman or Maruti. His name has been given to the car that moves India. He is a monkey-faced god found in Ramayana epic. When Sage Valmiki describes Hanuman, he calls Him the most learned, the valorous, and yet the most humble servant of Lord Rama. Lord Hanuman is also called by several names-Maruti, Anjaneya,Pawankumara, Vayuputra,Ramadasa etc.Hanuman Chalisa is the most famous hymn dedicated to Him.
There are some striking similarities apart from the fact the both have animal faces yet considered and worshipped for conferring on the devotees the education, wisdom, valor to face any obstacle and overcome it, the erudition, and the true enlightenment.
Both of them are sung highly by praising the chivalry they showed in removing the sadness and hassles of two women- Parvaati ( Umasutham soka vinasa) and Sita(Janaki sokanasanam) by Ganesha and Hanuman respectively.
Both of them involved in Bhagavat Gita- one for writing it when Sage Ved Vyasa composed Mahabharath verbatim and another remaining in the flag of the chariot of Arjun listening to Lord Krishna when He sang Gita for the benefit of humanity.
Ganesha wrote Mahabharath by breaking his tusk which he used as his pen. This story shows that Ganesha would go to any extent to help His devotee to fulfill a great task on hand that will serve humanity. Hanuman blessed Arjun that he would provide him with His prowess in the war against the evil and adharma supporting Dharma.
There is a form of deity which is the combined form of Ganesha and Hanuman and that goes by the name Athyandha Prabhu. This form is worshipped in South India and under the directions and blessings of Kanchi Paramacharya,a temple for Athyandha Prabha has been built in a place called Madhya Kailash in Chennai.
"Data Piracy is threatening Data Privacy".Information security starts with the CIA Triad-sounds more like mafia and counter-espionage jargon- is the bedrock of the cybersecurity edifice.CIA stands for Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability encompassing the entire gamut of Information security. Consider the following examples and contemplate on these real-life threats faced by all of us:
1)TWITTER SAYS 130 ACCOUNTS WERE TARGETED IN A MAJOR CYBER
ATTACK OF CELEBRITY ACCOUNTS TWO DAYS AGO SOURCE: BBC 17 JULY 20
2)MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL NOTIFIES GUESTS OF PROPERTY SYSTEM INCIDENT SOURCE:
HTTPS://NEWS.MARRIOTT.COM/NEWS/2020/03/31/MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL NOTIFIES GUESTS OF PROPERTY SYSTEM INCIDENT
The typical case is that of a mid-level officer in Vellore recently caught by the State DVAC who was found to be owning cash, jewellery, assets and landed properties to the tune of Rs100 cr.(link)
Pollution Control or management should be best left to experts and the bureaucrats should not be involved in this. The corporates should be under the surveillance and audit of third party experts certified by agencies like UNFCCC etc.
The present system provides for nexus between Corporates and the bureaucrats or Corporates and the political class with bureaucrats at their beck and call or bureaucrats in cahoots with crass politicians working against the Corporates. In every pemutation and combination you can imagine, the final loser is the country and its environment.
It is high time the Central Govt realised this and bring internationally accredited third party experts to evaluate the Environment Impact Assessments and also in regular certification of Corporates and their factories for consent to operate and run.
Whenever the complaints of pollution are received from citizens, these complaints may be properly looked into and investigated by one or more of these independent internationally accredited third-party experts.
Either the Central Govt on its own or SC must order Central Govt to bring in suitable legislation for bringing in transparency in the implementation of evaluation by independent pollution management experts in all areas of Envrionmental impact areas.
The above is from Daniel Kahnemann's magnum opus "Thinking, Fast and Slow". India is facing a shrinking pie situation with steep GDP contraction. Fiscal stimulus is imperative and it is expected on a yesterday war footing. Early birds and head-starts enhance hope and confidence which feed favourably into demand and investment.They also act as countercyclical to shrinking pie despondency. Credit boost is a temporary remedy to manufacturing machinery to kick start and keep up the production capacity. But it can work only up to a point, where the productivity and earnings should become sufficient to keep up with the plan of repayment of loans and borrowings. If the people in general do not foresee sufficient future income and employment, they may not turn out to buy things and assets.They cannot evergreen their loans like some corporates feeding only on liquidity. People should have sufficient disposable discretionary income to buy durables and assets. Or atleast have the confidence of generating future income through gainful employment or business opportunities. Otherwise it becomes a shrinking pie syndrome which feeds into further shrinkage, leading to a vicious cycle.
For quick results, Govt should look at products that have price elasticity. One of the products which is highly price sensitive is Automobile. Irrespective of the clamour of the opposition that cars are bought by the rick, Govt should look at the huge multiplier effect this will have on the rest of the economy. UPA Govt used this carrot when the economy plunged into an economic abyss following the financial crisis in 2008-09 and the growth revival was tough. UPA Govt responded by temporarily reducing Excise duty on Cars etc. in order to boost their demand.This action had a huge beneficial ripple and multiplier effects running across the economy.
However much you tweek monetary policy to boost credit offtake, unless it is followed up by fiscal measures to give a fillip to the demand generation, the credit growth will not be sustained. Fiscal measures must also be credible in the eyes of the public and for that products which have demonstrated price elasticity must be chosen. Only this can start rotating the wheels of the economy bringing about a virtuous cycle of employment,income and surplus.
Of course ,Govt has also taken measures under Atmanirbhar Bharat to promote Make in India to crank up the economy and the demand. But quick result areas and the low hanging fruits must be tried immediately.Govt must always remember:
"For want of a nail the shoe was lost.
For want of a shoe, the horse was lost.
For want of a horse , the rider was lost.
Under PLI scheme for Electronics mfg. 4% to 6% is the incentive on incremental sales over the base year and the scheme has three sub-categories-Mobile phone (International Cos), Mobile Phones(Domestic cos) and Specified Electronic Components Mfg. The govt recently announced 16 companies under these categories which included the likes of Samsung, Apple's Contract manufacturers Foxconn Hon Hai, Wistron, Pegatron and also Rising Star. Under the Domestic companies, Lava, Micromax etc. and under Specified Electronics components, 6 companies have been approved.Over the next 5 years, this policy initiative is expected to lead to the production of over Rs.10.5 lac cr with a likely export of over Rs.6.5 lac cr out of this, as per the Ministry of Electronics & IT.
Minister Mr.Ravishankar Prasad, exuded optimism that the Large Scale Electronics manufacturing would become successful under this PLI scheme providing huge employment opportunities and will set the right tone for all similar Atmanirbhar India schemes.The Cos. with an investment potential of Rs.11k Cr will be the torchbearers of this ambitious scheme which will put Make in India on a high pedestal in about 5 years' time.
Govt has also come out with PLI schemes for Pharma API and medical devices, which will entail a budgetary outgo of more than Rs.12K cr over the years.Since India is overdependent on China for Drug intermediates and APIs, this incentive scheme is expected to drive investments into these sectors making India self-sufficient in the years to come.This will give a fillip to manufacture of key starting materials(KSMs), DIs, and APIs and the scheme has been prepared to deliver Rs 7K cr as incentives for greenfield projects.Since India's pharma industry is the 3rd largest in the world and 14th largest in terms of value, this scheme has been designed to enhance the industry capabilities in terms of strengthening its value chain within the country with both backward and forward linkages.
All put together the Central Govt. has identified 10 sectors including the above. The other sectors like Battery storage, Solar PV modules, Automobile and auto components, textiles, food processing, white goods, telecom, and networking components.
The main aim of the scheme is to expand the manufacturing base of India in all these high potential niche products. However there are few criticisms by industry experts in smartphone manufacturing highlighting that this PLI scheme will only lead to an increase in domestic manufacturing value and not in increasing domestic value addition. This is explained by them saying that huge component imports from countries like South Korea and Taiwan and even China will continue. Since the focus is on phones which are priced Rs.15K and above ,which are mostly exported as against domestic mass consumption phones which fall under lower price category, they fear that this may be the picture on the ground. Some have also mentioned that even with this PLI, the Smartphone mfg. will still not be cost-competitive compared to China or even Vietnam. But the Govt strategy seems to be for incentivising the manufacturing within India and also for generating employment opportunities, so that value addition increase will happen over a period of time when the scale grows bigger and reaches the critical mass.
Now in order to support the Make in India under the overarching Atmanirbhar programme, Govt has chosen to ban the import of Pneumatic tyres, Airconditoners etc. This has been done not due to protectionist policies but in order to enable the nascent manufacturing to stand on its own legs and survive the vagaries of trade. The Govt. will have to be suitably cautioned not to persist with this policy of import restrictions for long beyond 3 years, since the flip side of it is poor quality and high price to the consumers.
With the above well laid out paths for manufacturing to take firm roots in this country, and with its contribution to GDP increasing from 14% at present,India is poised to compete with countries like China in the years to come.But the journey is forecast to be uphill and strenuous. An unshackled India can emerge victorious when pushed to a corner in a crisis like the prevailing one.
In FY25, India's Goods and Services Tax (GST) collections showed robust growth, with gross collections reaching ₹22.08 lakh crore (a...