Altman Z score and RBI Kamath committee ratios.

 Edward Altman published the Z score formula for predicting bankruptcy way back in 1968. He said this formula can be judiciously used to find whether any company may go into bankruptcy within the next two years. It is a quick find formula to gauge the financial health for publicly held companies by using the P&L values and Balance sheet values through a mix of business ratios.

In simple terms Z =1.2X1+1.4X2+3.3X3+0.6X4+1.0X5, where

X1= Working capital/Total assets.i.e the ratio of liquid assets in relation to the total assets or size of the Co.

X2=Retained earnings/Total assets i.e the ratio of retained profit in relation to the total assets of the Co.

X3=EBIT/Total Assets i.e the ratio of efficiency of the operations without the impact of leveraging, in relation to the assets deployed in the Co.also signifying the importance of operating earnings for the long term financial health of the Co.

X4=market capitalisation/book value of total liabilities i.e the ratio of market price in relation to the total liabilities incl. borrowings are  considered as a reflection financial health;

X5= Total sales/ Total assets i.e the ratio of assets turnover indicating how well the assets are utilised to generate the sales.

There are some variations for privately held companies and for service cos.

What is the necessity for delving into this formula of bankruptcy now? RBI appointed KV Kamath Committee has come out with similar ratios for the use of banks in identifying distress among the Indian business companies with various ratio values depending on the kind of business the cos concerned are in.

The Committee came out with the following ratios, that were selected based on their relevance for Resolution Plan for the distressed cos. when their loans are put to restructuring by the banks. 

1)Total outside liabilities(TOL)/Adjusted Tangible Networth(ATNW)i.e Adjusted Net of investments;

2)Total Debt/EBIDTA ;

3)Current Ratio;

4)Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR);i.e the ratio of the addition of the net cash accruals with interest and finance charges divided by the addition of the current portion of the long-term debt with interest and finance charges.

5) Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio (ADSCR) i.e average over the loan period.

All these ratios are highly relevant with a well-defined threshold for various industries of the domestic economy including that of services, for those looking at the financial health of the Companies. Many Credit Rating Agencies also use many of these ratios. Perhaps, the Altman Z score may also be included for evaluating the preponderance to bankruptcy among the Co.s  under the distressed category seeking their bank loans to be restructured.

Indian Acts, amendments and russian roulette!

 Whenever any change in the IT Act is contemplated it should be put through only one filter which is "simplification" of the tax. Revenue considerations, whether an increase or decrease, not to enter as a filter for any piecemeal or Adhoc changes during the course of the year.  Simplification, reduction of tax, widening of tax base may be used as multiple filters for once a year changes in the Budget. Many times an amendment is done in the name of maximizing tax revenues and plugging loopholes. This is a pure travesty of truth. Instead, Govt should move towards simplification and ease of compliance. This obsession with revenue maximization is a colonial hangover.

Very often IRS officers and CBDT also complain about CAG Damocles sword over their heads if they don't plug loopholes. Indirectly such a plethora of amendments and tinkering goads loophole industry to become more innovative.CAs, lawyers enjoy and thrive on this.More the loopholes and more the plugging.More they change,more they remain the same!!!

Probably many are trying to say if simplified ,more taxes thro voluntary compliance can be collected. They also suggest a remedy like new simple Direct Tax Code ( DTC),which is good but may throw more complications ,uncertainty ,unintended consequences into the moribund system if this new tax code is introduced all of a sudden (like that of GST).So at least in the short to medium term, Central govt should work towards only simplification in terms of return filing, assessments, presumptive tax , reducing litigation etc and keep revenue maximization in the back burner.

 One of the important points in this context needs some elaboration.AOs, CIT Appeals have a tendency to overrule a precedent Court judgment by taking a flimsy, perverted, convoluted argument or a trivial or a vexatious finding to make the court ruling inapplicable,just to maximize revenue collections and reach their targets for the year.Then deliberately they will make mistakes in calculations just to boost unpaid tax amount and threaten the assessees subtly showing it as arrears in demand.These are all euphemistically called "high pitched" assessments.!!

Few funny examples of unintended consequences or "Cobra effect" are given below:

1)Under IndAs, Redeemable Preference shares will have to be grouped under Borrowings and not to be included under Share Capital. This is in line with IFRS ,since Redeemable Pref.Shares with a fixed dividend payments have the substance similar to that of a borrowing even though by name they are called Shares.

However under our Cos. Act, 2013, the Redeemable Pref.Shares are continued to be classified as part of paidup Share capital.

This dichotomy, apart from skewing Debt:Equity ratios create other unintended consequences in the declaration of ShareCapital for the appointment of KMPs etc. and for presentation to the Lending institutions, Credit Rating Agencies etc.

An amendment in Cos. Act to align this with IndAs is long pending and would be a welcome step.

2)Similar is the case with depreciation calculation under Cos. Act and Indian Income Tax Act. Depreciation under IT Act can be charged at a higher rate (accelerated rate) allowable under the Act for claiming higher tax rebate whereas Cos. Act & IndAs prescribe lower rates for presenting the Financial Statements for declaration of dividend etc. Due to this anomaly every year Indian companies will have to work out Deferred Tax liability for deferring the tax by availing higher depreciation. Over the period the profits under Tax and IndAs will be smoothened out. This is pure legislative fiction. By aligning the tax rates under both the legislations this fiction can be easily removed. Is our Govt listening to simplification or trying to complicate things in the name of simplification.!!!

If anybody wagers on Russian roulette, most of the time winning it would depend on your luck and stars, and similar is the case of somebody wading through the muddy waters of Indian Income tax Act.