Blogging about Society, individual and collective behaviour/herd mentality, nudges,economics,business,politics,sports and spirituality and on all the other subjects about which I know very little !!
Indian Central Govt. successfully pushed 3 Farm bills through both the Houses of Parliament last week. Since the ruling NDA led by BJP has a majority in the lower house i.e Lok Sabha the passage of these bills happened without any hiccup there. But when the same bills had to be passed by the higher house i.e Rajya Sabha, where NDA has a thin majority, pandemonium reigned and all hell broke loose. But the Chairman of the house went by voice vote amidst allegations that he chose to ignore the call for division of the house.
Now the opposition is upset not by the farm bills per see but the way it was carried by the Chairman by the Upper house by not allowing them to stall this reform in the garb of discussions et al. Several Agricultural Commissions and Committees incl the Sen Committee and Dr.Swaminathan Comittee over the last 30 years, have strongly suggested on this unshackling of Agri markets across the country. This reform is long overdue. Even Congress Govt. wanted to implement this and it is in their election manifesto. But due to the reversal of roles, now Congress does not want this to be passed by Modi in order to deny him the credit for this. It is nothing but opportunism and blinded by the hatred for Modi ,UPA wants Indian farmers to suffer.
The three reform bills passed and approved by the President are :
1)Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020.:-This bill aims to promote barrier-free interstate and intra-state trade in agricultural produce;
2)Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement of Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020:- This is for allowing farmers to engage with processors, aggregators, wholesalers, large retailers and exporters directly;
3)Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill, 2020:-to generally liberalise the regulatory environment for the farmers and to free them from the clutches of middlemen.
The twist in the tale which adds spice to the whole drama has been clearly brought out in this article by Sanjay Jha(link) when he says Dr.Man Mohan Singh went on television when UPA was ruling, to assure the farmers that by a similar action of passing the farm bills their lives would be made better and he tried to assuage their hurt feelings. When the agri reforms ordinance was promulgated in May 2020, pl. note the tone and tenor of agri economists like Prof Ashok Gulati who backed these ordinances hailing this as "the 1991 moment "for agri reforms.(link)
People who are now opposing the momentous changes to be ushered through these far-reaching farm bills are those who have vested interests in the continuation of status quo. There are many middlemen who make money and lend/give easy money to politicians try to block these bills. Many of them do not pay income tax by showing that their income is agricultural income. Now this lot is in dire straits and does not want to let go off the golden goose from their hands. By supporting these elements the opposition is revealing their colours to the public scrutiny.
With many assemble elections around the corner, politicians are trying to portray themselves as the saviour of the farmers by misleading the gullible farmers against these reforms. By repeating a lie, that Govt will abolish MSP, they are stoking the farmers' fears and are trying to create panic and chaos among the farmers. This is despite PM Modi assuring on the floor of the Parliament that the MSP mechanism will not be revoked at any point in time in the future.
The farmers must see through these games played by the opposition parties, and understand that more choices for them to market their produce will not set them back both financially as well as socially. They should look at the stories of ITC eChoupal, Mahindra's, Amul's agri ventures, and emulate them by evolving their cooperative community farming to further their dreams in those lines.
When fruits, vegetables and milk are sold liberally without the MSP crutches, farmers must introspect and understand that MSPs help only 6% of the total agricultural output in the country.
Multiple avenues to market their farm output will only lead them to a better future!!
Import Trade wall or barriers are not new to India. The country had very steep walls in terms of Tariffs, licensing ,quotas etc. all in the name of safeguarding the domestic industry. When the country gained independence, many of the industries were either nascent or anemic and in order to restore their health, Central Govt had no option but to erect some import restrictions so that local industries in the economy are nurtured. This grooming of domestic industry with level playing field took a new turn in the late 1960s and 1970s with widespread nationalisation of private enterprises, ushering in an era of erratic socialism all in the name of protecting the citizens from private profiteering.
This concept led to erecting walls within the country between the commanding heights of Govt. undertakings and the Private enterprises. The private sector was neglected and was left to fend for itself and scaling up an enterprise became a uphill challenge for private sector. Inorder to protect them from imports from manufacturing bases around the world with deep pockets several safeguard duties and tariff walls were made stiff .
But all this had a negative side effects as the local industry became flabby, lethargic,self seeking, ignoring Tech.upgradation, without stiff market competition on Quality , Cost and Delivery.All this was done with the good intention of making India self restraint through import substitution. But the unintended consequences of this led to high cost of manufacuring and poor quality product.This situation was reversed when GOI started reducing tariffs and import restrictions through some pragmatic steps inviting foreign direct investments in the early 1990s.
By the time we missed the bus and Chinese who started this in 1980s had a clear headstart over us. Our two steps forward and one step backward strategy in all these matters of import policy were designed by bureaucrats with the hidden intent of rent seeking politicians, businessmen and babus behind it.
Only after the advent of Japanese, US ,German and South korean companies started their manufacturing bases in India , Quality, Cost and Delivery gained attention and became the guiding lodetones of enterprises keeping them lean and mean. This tough market competition has helped India in achieving the pinnacle of success in Auto sector especially in becoming World's top two wheeler manufacturing base.
That said , now there is lot of discussion on Govt's announcement of Trade tariffs for imports from China and licesing and ban on import of defence equipments, high end TVs etc. The heated debate of back to the moribund policy of import restrictions in the name of Make in India- Atmanirbhar Bharat is indeed a good one.
Does this mean back to the future?
But there can be an argument in terms of supporting this policy of import restrictions.
When fledgling industry is sought to be setup like in high end tech products, these specific products may require some sort of support or sops for a initial few years. When foreign direct investment is invited for huge sunrise industries, such import walls will be helpful but all but temporarily. If there is a sunset clause introduced for all these tariff or sops or subsidies, it should be welcome. Govt. should make it a point to insert a sunset clause for all these import walls except in very few strategic sectors which may not exceed five on the whole.Govt should not give an impression that it is interested in augmenting its tax revenue through these high import duties.
India has given a great fillip to Make in India- Atmanirbhar in some of the industries like Auto, Smartphones etc which has generated huge employment opportunities in the country. Inorder to give a temporary boost to this policy, Govt has done the right thing by introducing few Tariff walls in order to promote the above stated policy and these Tariff barriers should neither be seen as a way of revenue rising, nor as a permanent fixture to protect the domestic industry.
