Altman Z score and RBI Kamath committee ratios.

 Edward Altman published the Z score formula for predicting bankruptcy way back in 1968. He said this formula can be judiciously used to find whether any company may go into bankruptcy within the next two years. It is a quick find formula to gauge the financial health for publicly held companies by using the P&L values and Balance sheet values through a mix of business ratios.

In simple terms Z =1.2X1+1.4X2+3.3X3+0.6X4+1.0X5, where

X1= Working capital/Total assets.i.e the ratio of liquid assets in relation to the total assets or size of the Co.

X2=Retained earnings/Total assets i.e the ratio of retained profit in relation to the total assets of the Co.

X3=EBIT/Total Assets i.e the ratio of efficiency of the operations without the impact of leveraging, in relation to the assets deployed in the Co.also signifying the importance of operating earnings for the long term financial health of the Co.

X4=market capitalisation/book value of total liabilities i.e the ratio of market price in relation to the total liabilities incl. borrowings are  considered as a reflection financial health;

X5= Total sales/ Total assets i.e the ratio of assets turnover indicating how well the assets are utilised to generate the sales.

There are some variations for privately held companies and for service cos.

What is the necessity for delving into this formula of bankruptcy now? RBI appointed KV Kamath Committee has come out with similar ratios for the use of banks in identifying distress among the Indian business companies with various ratio values depending on the kind of business the cos concerned are in.

The Committee came out with the following ratios, that were selected based on their relevance for Resolution Plan for the distressed cos. when their loans are put to restructuring by the banks. 

1)Total outside liabilities(TOL)/Adjusted Tangible Networth(ATNW)i.e Adjusted Net of investments;

2)Total Debt/EBIDTA ;

3)Current Ratio;

4)Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR);i.e the ratio of the addition of the net cash accruals with interest and finance charges divided by the addition of the current portion of the long-term debt with interest and finance charges.

5) Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio (ADSCR) i.e average over the loan period.

All these ratios are highly relevant with a well-defined threshold for various industries of the domestic economy including that of services, for those looking at the financial health of the Companies. Many Credit Rating Agencies also use many of these ratios. Perhaps, the Altman Z score may also be included for evaluating the preponderance to bankruptcy among the Co.s  under the distressed category seeking their bank loans to be restructured.

Compensation to States and Borrower of the Last resort!

 India's FM is an unenviable position. Given the penchant for two steps forward and one step backward in all economic decisions, FM is in the eye of the storm unendingly ever since the pandemic struck India. In fact, even before that, India's GDP was sliding YOY from 2016-17 onwards. It hit a high of 8.26% in 16-17 and hit the lowest so far in Fiscal 19-20 at 4.2%.

GST collections have also ebbed along with the GDP since even Nominal GDP has grown only by 7.2% in Fy 19-20.It was growing at 11.76% in Fiscal 16-17. So, this skidding of the nominal growth rate coupled with a reduction in GST rates in 2018 led to a shortfall in GST collections even though the tax base widened. The good thing about the One Nation, One tax has been the acceptance of this Taxation in lieu of VAT at the individual state level and Excise duty at the Central level. The consensus behind GST has been bought by Arun Jaitley with the commitment for providing Central funds at the growth rate of 14% YOY to the individual States, by levying Compensatory cess on luxury and sin goods. However, the Central Govt is caught on the wrong foot this year due to the pandemic. The tax collections are abysmally low and this has forced the Central Govt. to consider reneging on its promise of providing compensatory funds to the states.

In the recent 41st GST Council meeting, FM has been compelled to use the insurance phrase of Act of God i.e force majeure(or Hand of China?!), to describe the extraordinary situation due to the Covid pandemic. Due to this compulsion, the Central Govt has presented two options to the States to consider and give their replies in a week's time. Under Option 1 States may borrow Rs.97K cr at a special interest rate and the principal and the interest will be later on paid out of Compensatory cess on Cars, Soft drinks, tobacco, pan masala, and coal. Under Option 2 States can borrow up to Rs.2.35lac cr and States will have to pay interest at the market rates.Only the principal will be paid out of Compensatory Cess later and the interest will have to be provided in the States' Budgets. In this GOI has made a fine distinction between GST implementation loss and Covid induced tax revenue loss which is also hair-splitting and needlessly academic, if not contentious.

Now the overall emerging scenario is one of confrontation between the Centre and the States. All economists are now supporting the States saying that since it is the commitment of the Central Govt. it has to find the resources for funding this GST collection shortfall. Of course, they are of the view that the Central Govt can source this fund at a much cheaper cost than what the States could bargain for.This is an important point. However Finance Secretary has gone on record saying that if the Centre resorts to this borrowings, overall bond yields may go northwards, which will raise the cost of borrowings for both the Public sector and Private Sector. As a consequence, the sovereign rating of the country may be adversely impacted which will be detrimental to the interests of all sectors of the economy. But the moot point is this can happen even if States borrow for this purpose.

In the meantime some of the opposition ruled states are considering approaching SC for a direction to the Central Govt, saying that the Centre is trying to hide behind AG's legal opinions, shirking its responsibility in honoring the revenue commitment in letter and spirit. But such an outcome may not augur well for federal relationships and for the future of cooperative federalism which is touted as the big success point behind GST introduction.

However, in all this surcharged situation over who should shoulder the borrowing burden, the missing point is how well or badly States are containing their deficits in the last few years despite being given higher level of funds without much of efforts from their side. Any additional funds given without caveats are being frittered away by them in giving freebies, free EB and in unplanned revenue expenditure. So who is going to discipline them and rein in their penchant for spending without answering for outcomes? Even in May 20, when Centre gave permission for Additional borrowings through the WMA window, many states incl. Tamilnadu objected to the thinnest of the sticks like DBT transfer of EB subsidy to BPL families, that came with the carrot. States only want the carrot as their right without any strings being attached.

That said, Central Govt. must seize this opportunity to bring to light the importance of fiscal discipline at the State level by finally agreeing to resort to the borrowings on their behalf.

If you consider the Center and the State as the right and the left hands of the same person, sometimes when your right hand is full of weight to be lifted, the left hand also should chip in to bear the weight in order to balance it. Left cannot accuse the right of transferring some of the weight to it!!

Lockdowns ,Unlocks and White elephants!

 

We have had four lockdowns and unlocks across the country.To start with it was Complete lockdown, which struck like a bolt from the blue starting from March 24th till May 31st 2020. Many prominent opposition leaders severely criticized the Govt for this lockdown accusing Modi of dictatorship tendency throwing the hungry, poverty-stricken, migrants on the streets and pavements uncared for. The second lockdown little relaxed was in June as experimentation and once the pandemic started spreading wildly, Govt. was again back to stricter lockdowns. But by the end of june, Central Govt realized that the question of livelihood was becoming important and advised staggered unlocks.

But many states ruled by opposition leaders taking a holier than Centre attitude continued with strict lockdowns introducing epasses even for intrastate movements, imposing restrictions like total lockdowns during weekends making life difficult for the common man. There was a tough competition between states as to who leads in making life miserable for the man on the street.

Now the whole world is praising Modi for his foresight in clamping down a total lockdown inorder to control the spread of the pandemic. Opposition leaders have grudgingly acknowledging this, have now started saying that because of lockdown Indian economy is in ruins.

India had to face many unwanted human tragedies in between due to industrial accidents in Vizag, Neyveli,etc.fire accidents, air accident in Kochi, and also serious border clashes with China apart from terrorist incursions in J&K from Pak.

In the meantime, Central Govt unveiled Atmanirbhar initiatives, Agri reforms, and announced Rs.21 lac crore package of measures to revive the economy.

In the melee that followed, India is still left with some white elephants like Air India which are a drain on the exchequer.Air India should have been corporatized, separating the ownership and the management at least five years back. Had Central Govt taken this bold step at that time we would have found real value of the Air India as a Corporate entity. We understand that when Jitendra Bhargava wrote a book "Descent of Air India", it kicked off a political storm with Praful Patel filing a defamation case in  the court to get a ban on the book. But the author self-released it  in 2016 and is available on Amazon kindle as an e-book.Praful Patel withdrew his defamation suit in 2017.

Now with Air India only its Intangible asset of Bilateral Landing Rights is the most valuable of all assets.This has been brought out by Kumar V.Pratap former Joint Secy,GOI, in his recent article in FE wherein he has said that Planning Commission in 2011,refused permission to publish his earlier article on Privatisation of Air India(see the link) .Now the quotes for the sale of Air India have been invited through a global tendering process. The last date for submission of bids have also been so far postponed 4 times and now the last date stands at 31st Oct.When Travel & tourism and more particularly the aviation sector around the world has been severely crippled by the pandemic , finding a suitable bidder would be highly improbable. But Govt is left with Hobson's choice now.It has to bide its time for a suitor when the airline continues to lose its value and burn tax payers' money.

BPCL sale tendering process also is in the limbo due to the prevailing uncertainty induced by the pandemic. Other PSU divestments are also moving at snail's pace due to lockdowns.

To sum up, the Govt is unable to unlock the value for its assets!!

Indian Acts, amendments and russian roulette!

 Whenever any change in the IT Act is contemplated it should be put through only one filter which is "simplification" of the tax. Revenue considerations, whether an increase or decrease, not to enter as a filter for any piecemeal or Adhoc changes during the course of the year.  Simplification, reduction of tax, widening of tax base may be used as multiple filters for once a year changes in the Budget. Many times an amendment is done in the name of maximizing tax revenues and plugging loopholes. This is a pure travesty of truth. Instead, Govt should move towards simplification and ease of compliance. This obsession with revenue maximization is a colonial hangover.

Very often IRS officers and CBDT also complain about CAG Damocles sword over their heads if they don't plug loopholes. Indirectly such a plethora of amendments and tinkering goads loophole industry to become more innovative.CAs, lawyers enjoy and thrive on this.More the loopholes and more the plugging.More they change,more they remain the same!!!

Probably many are trying to say if simplified ,more taxes thro voluntary compliance can be collected. They also suggest a remedy like new simple Direct Tax Code ( DTC),which is good but may throw more complications ,uncertainty ,unintended consequences into the moribund system if this new tax code is introduced all of a sudden (like that of GST).So at least in the short to medium term, Central govt should work towards only simplification in terms of return filing, assessments, presumptive tax , reducing litigation etc and keep revenue maximization in the back burner.

 One of the important points in this context needs some elaboration.AOs, CIT Appeals have a tendency to overrule a precedent Court judgment by taking a flimsy, perverted, convoluted argument or a trivial or a vexatious finding to make the court ruling inapplicable,just to maximize revenue collections and reach their targets for the year.Then deliberately they will make mistakes in calculations just to boost unpaid tax amount and threaten the assessees subtly showing it as arrears in demand.These are all euphemistically called "high pitched" assessments.!!

Few funny examples of unintended consequences or "Cobra effect" are given below:

1)Under IndAs, Redeemable Preference shares will have to be grouped under Borrowings and not to be included under Share Capital. This is in line with IFRS ,since Redeemable Pref.Shares with a fixed dividend payments have the substance similar to that of a borrowing even though by name they are called Shares.

However under our Cos. Act, 2013, the Redeemable Pref.Shares are continued to be classified as part of paidup Share capital.

This dichotomy, apart from skewing Debt:Equity ratios create other unintended consequences in the declaration of ShareCapital for the appointment of KMPs etc. and for presentation to the Lending institutions, Credit Rating Agencies etc.

An amendment in Cos. Act to align this with IndAs is long pending and would be a welcome step.

2)Similar is the case with depreciation calculation under Cos. Act and Indian Income Tax Act. Depreciation under IT Act can be charged at a higher rate (accelerated rate) allowable under the Act for claiming higher tax rebate whereas Cos. Act & IndAs prescribe lower rates for presenting the Financial Statements for declaration of dividend etc. Due to this anomaly every year Indian companies will have to work out Deferred Tax liability for deferring the tax by availing higher depreciation. Over the period the profits under Tax and IndAs will be smoothened out. This is pure legislative fiction. By aligning the tax rates under both the legislations this fiction can be easily removed. Is our Govt listening to simplification or trying to complicate things in the name of simplification.!!!

If anybody wagers on Russian roulette, most of the time winning it would depend on your luck and stars, and similar is the case of somebody wading through the muddy waters of Indian Income tax Act.