Significance of Ayodhya temple for Civilisational re-awakening

 "தருமத்தின் வாழ்வதனை சூது கவ்வும்;தருமம் மறுபடியும் வெல்லும்" என்ற பாரதியின் வாக்கு பலித்தது - நேரடியான எடுத்துக்காட்டு அயோத்தி இராமர் கோவில்.

This Ram temple has become a reality in India after 500 years and still those who are opposing it must remember that it has not been built in Mecca or Medina ,but in Ram's Janmasthan/birthplace in Ayodhya in India i.e Bharat!!

It is incumbent upon media and Journalists to write reinforcing PM's words on Goodness ,Harmony and Dharm represented by Ram.Ram, according to Valmiki, lived as an ideal man which needs to be emulated by all human beings.Truth,Valour, sacrifice, patience, perseverance , endurance,persistence,forgiving others,being grateful are all eternal ideas and Ram is the personification of these values in life.His friendship with Tribal king Guha and his acceptance of forlorn Sabari are symbols of love, inclusivity and humility. We should Write how Ram's value systems are relevant to India as a modern civilisation  and  to our Constitutional Rule of Law .Ayodhya Court battle itself was a true representation of Ram's Rule of Law where all sides were given equal chance to air their views and present evidences.Court verdict was won not by the Might of the Majority but by Ram's way of Equity ,justice and Rightfulness. It was a judgment "by the Righteous,for the Righteous &of the Righteous"

Gandhiji said that Rama and Rahim are one for him but , whether the Muslims were and are  prepared to accept his words and accept any diety?So without acceptance or meeting of minds , Gandhiji's words sound hollow and empty and so his words lost its relevance . His words cannot be sought to be forced upon one side alone, by letting of the other side by pampering or appeasing them.To some extent ,to show the large heartedness we can extend our friendship hand and if they hit our hands taking our compassion and concern as cowardice, then the other side will only invite reaction and retaliation

Yes, the structure that was deemed to be masjid was demolished and then Ram temple has risen there.However those who are opposing must also remember these things 1) in the first place it was not used for prayers/namaz by Muslims for many years atleast since the locking of its gates by Congress Govt since 1950 onwards;2) Supreme Court has looked at it as land ownership dispute and has settled the case in favour of the Hindus who presented evidences and records to prove their genuine ownership.3)Say a land is owned by those opposing the temple and the usurper of their land after taking illegal possession constructs a house in that land, would these owners abandon their land in favour of usurper and allow him to use the house constructed in their land , genuinely owned by them?!